Item talk:Q80626: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I am wondering whether it is necessary to have lieutenant Q80626 as a military rank and lieutenant Q36774 as a career statement. In my view it is the same item, with two diffe...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am wondering whether it is necessary to have lieutenant Q80626 as a military rank and lieutenant Q36774 as a career statement. In my view it is the same item, with two different viewpoints, an instance of career statement and a subclass of military rank. Therefore, I propose that they be merged. --[[User:Bruno Belhoste|Bruno Belhoste]] ([[User talk:Bruno Belhoste|talk]]) 20:26, 20 May 2020 (CEST) | I am wondering whether it is necessary to have lieutenant Q80626 as a military rank and lieutenant Q36774 as a career statement. In my view it is the same item, with two different viewpoints, an instance of career statement and a subclass of military rank. Therefore, I propose that they be merged. --[[User:Bruno Belhoste|Bruno Belhoste]] ([[User talk:Bruno Belhoste|talk]]) 20:26, 20 May 2020 (CEST) | ||
:1+, please merge.--[[User:Martin Gollasch|Martin Gollasch]] ([[User talk:Martin Gollasch|talk]]) 20:32, 20 May 2020 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 20 May 2020
I am wondering whether it is necessary to have lieutenant Q80626 as a military rank and lieutenant Q36774 as a career statement. In my view it is the same item, with two different viewpoints, an instance of career statement and a subclass of military rank. Therefore, I propose that they be merged. --Bruno Belhoste (talk) 20:26, 20 May 2020 (CEST)
- 1+, please merge.--Martin Gollasch (talk) 20:32, 20 May 2020 (CEST)