Letter Johann Friedrich Kleuker, 1783-10-10 (Q8207): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Olaf Simons (talk | contribs) (Removed claim: Part of (P8): Letter Johann Martin Graf zu Stolberg-Roßla to Johann Adam Weishaupt, Neuwied, 1782-03-07 (Q8163), #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1568280059158) |
Olaf Simons (talk | contribs) (Added [en] description: Complains about the inclusion of Mauvillon, known as a 'religious mocker'; as a connoisseur of the history of religion, Boulanger's book is for him a 'ballet of limping hypotheses'., #quickstatements; #temporary_bat...) |
||
description / en | description / en | ||
Complains about the inclusion of Mauvillon, known as a 'religious mocker'; as a connoisseur of the history of religion, Boulanger's book is for him a 'ballet of limping hypotheses'. |
Revision as of 21:39, 20 March 2020
Complains about the inclusion of Mauvillon, known as a 'religious mocker'; as a connoisseur of the history of religion, Boulanger's book is for him a 'ballet of limping hypotheses'.
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Letter Johann Friedrich Kleuker, 1783-10-10 |
Complains about the inclusion of Mauvillon, known as a 'religious mocker'; as a connoisseur of the history of religion, Boulanger's book is for him a 'ballet of limping hypotheses'. |
Statements
10 October 1783Gregorian
0 references
Beschwert sich über die Aufnahme des als ‘Religions-Spötter’ bekannten Mauvillon; als Kenner der Religionsgeschichte ist für ihn Boulangers Buch ein ‘ballet hinkender Hypothesen’.
0 references
StA Hamburg: 614-1/72, Große Loge, 5.1.10, Nr. 1256
0 references