Item talk:Q396080: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tinghui Duan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tinghui Duan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Thanks for the advice! I didn't notice the limit of max. 350 statements. --[[User:Tinghui Duan|Tinghui Duan]] ([[User talk:Tinghui Duan|talk]]) 18:11, 9 April 2022 (CEST) | : Thanks for the advice! I didn't notice the limit of max. 350 statements. --[[User:Tinghui Duan|Tinghui Duan]] ([[User talk:Tinghui Duan|talk]]) 18:11, 9 April 2022 (CEST) | ||
: Should the P133-statements be kept in the item, despite of the limit of FactGrid Viewer? Otherwise, the Property P133 (have participant) seems pointless. --[[User:Tinghui Duan|Tinghui Duan]] ([[User talk:Tinghui Duan|talk]]) 18:19, 9 April 2022 (CEST) |
Revision as of 18:19, 9 April 2022
There are 420 participants to the conference. it's a lot and too much for the FactGrid Viewer (limited at 350 stateemnts by Item). As ad good practice it's better to put this piece of information as a statement for each participant and to have in DHd 2022 a sparql query which gives the list of the participants ([1]). --Bruno Belhoste (talk) 16:01, 9 April 2022 (CEST)
- Thanks for the advice! I didn't notice the limit of max. 350 statements. --Tinghui Duan (talk) 18:11, 9 April 2022 (CEST)
- Should the P133-statements be kept in the item, despite of the limit of FactGrid Viewer? Otherwise, the Property P133 (have participant) seems pointless. --Tinghui Duan (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2022 (CEST)