FactGrid:Coins and Currencies: Difference between revisions

From FactGrid
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:1896GOP.JPG|thumb|500px|US political campaigning against bimetalism, i.e. politics on a currency that binds the gold to the silver value. Silver is flowing into the eastern economies due to political decisions of the Democratic party]]
[[File:1896GOP.JPG|thumb|500px|1896 US political campaigning against bimetalism, i.e. politics on a currency that binds the gold to the silver value. Silver is flowing into the eastern economies due to political decisions of the Democratic party]]
== A brief historical introduction ==
== A brief historical introduction ==


Line 6: Line 6:
Some things were easier though: Today's currencies are fluctuating in a constant fixing performed on the market that is trading with foreign currencies.
Some things were easier though: Today's currencies are fluctuating in a constant fixing performed on the market that is trading with foreign currencies.


Early modern currencies were metal based, that is the monetary value was basically in the coin: an amount of silver, gold, or copper people which would carry around. The coins would wear off over time, that was basically the constant loss of value everyone had to take into account.
Early modern currencies were metal based, that is the monetary value was basically in the coin: an amount of silver, gold, or copper people would carry around. The coins would wear off over time and the territorial mints would sooner or later replace a particular coin like a silver Shilling with an equivalent coin of a lower silver content thus making money of the constant degradation of the circulating coins; that was basically the constant loss of value everyone had to handle (those with productive capital would do this better than poor people who could only save their money).


Sums of money would, therefore, be usually given in a book currency independent of all the actual coins: The Reichsthaler, the Pound Sterling etc. had stable fixed silver or gold values while an existing coinage would make that sum at any given moment, more or less accurately. Traders would know the fixed ratio between two currencies like "9 Pound sterling is 40 Reichstaler between the 1690s and 1750)". Bills of exchange would make it unnecessary to carry larger sums of money from one spot to the next. Contact a Merchants with connections to a city you want to visit; give him money you want to spend in this city and he will give you a bill of exchange on which his business partner will give you that very sum in local currency. (The merchants use the arising deficits in their own internal trading.)
Sums of money were usually given in a book currencies independent of the coins circulating: Units like the Reichsthaler and the Pound Sterling had stable fixed silver or gold values while the existing coins would make a varying sum at any given moment. Traders knew the fixed ratios between two currencies like "9 Pound Sterling is 40 Reichstaler" and these ratios remained stable from the 17th into the 18th century. "Bills of exchange" ("Wechsel") would make it unnecessary to carry larger sums of money from one spot to another. You contacted a Merchant with connections to a city you wanted to visit; you gave him the money you want to spend in that other city and he would give you a bill of exchange on which his business partner abroad would give you that very sum in local currency. The merchants in turn could use temporary deficits as assets in their own internal trading.


The system was complex with the constants degradation of circulating coinage against the backdrop of the stable book currencies and with the flow of the metals gold, silver and (less problematic) copper that needed an internal balance in an currency that used the three metals. As soon as another nation had a different notion of that balance the market would create a flow of the respective metal into the part of the world that had a higher esteem for the respective metal.
The system was globally complex with the constant degradation of circulating coinages and the flow of the metals gold and silver between the nations. As soon as a nation had a different fixing of the gold-silver balance the market would create a flow of the undervalued metal into those parts of the world that did not follow the metrics.


== Calculate with historical moneys ==
== Calculate with historical moneys ==
Calculations with the established exchange rates are relatively safe and stable between 1650 and 1750. The [http://www.pierre-marteau.com/currency/converter.html The Marteau Early 18th-Century Currency Converter] offers a tool set.
Calculations with the established exchange rates like the "9 Pound Sterling equals 40 Reichsthaler" are relatively safe between 1650 and 1750. The [http://www.pierre-marteau.com/currency/converter.html The Marteau Early 18th-Century Currency Converter] offers a tool set.


You can otherwise gain independence with a calculation that converts the sum into silver equivalents. This is relatively safe up to the year 1871 when Germany introduces the Gold standard. Up to that point individual nations could move from gold to silver standards and back and still stay in a corridor of a global notion of rough equivalents between gold and silver. After the 1860s, however, silver is loosing rapidly against gold, jumping from a ratio of once 1:14 to 1:100. (These fluctuations are not over yet, we are still witnessing a good deal of speculation on this market today especially with anticipations of the rise and fall of gold on the present silver market.)
You can otherwise gain independence with a calculation that converts the sum into silver or gold equivalents. This is relatively safe up to the year 1871 when big players like Germany introduce the Gold standard without taking care of the silver value any longer. Up to that point individual nations could move from gold to silver standards and back with minor economic repercussions - they still remained in a corridor of the global notion of rough equivalents between gold and silver. After the 1860s, however, silver is loosing rapidly against gold, jumping from a ratio of once 1:14 to 1:100. These fluctuations are not yet over, we are still witnessing a good deal of speculation on the gold-silver parity especially with anticipations of the rise and fall of gold on the silver market.


=== Use SPARQL to convert sums into silver equivalents ===
=== Use SPARQL to convert sums into silver equivalents ===


FactGrid coins and FactGrid items for the stable book currencies come with silver and gold equivalents, so that you can use a conversion into the silver equivalent to compare statements of values between currencies and over longer periods of time.
FactGrid coins and FactGrid items for the stable book currencies (should all) come with silver and gold equivalents (not to be confused wit the silver content that has its own property)  and with date ranges for this information, so that you can use a conversion into the silver equivalent to compare statements of values between currencies and over longer periods of time.


The following search gives the SPARQL-code for a conversion - here of German 19th-century Reichstaler:
The following search gives the SPARQL-code for a conversion - here of German 19th-century Reichstaler:

Latest revision as of 08:27, 27 September 2023

1896 US political campaigning against bimetalism, i.e. politics on a currency that binds the gold to the silver value. Silver is flowing into the eastern economies due to political decisions of the Democratic party

A brief historical introduction

Calculating with historical sums of money is at first sight a thing for specialists, numismatists. The currencies are obsolete and usually not even organised in decimal systems.

Some things were easier though: Today's currencies are fluctuating in a constant fixing performed on the market that is trading with foreign currencies.

Early modern currencies were metal based, that is the monetary value was basically in the coin: an amount of silver, gold, or copper people would carry around. The coins would wear off over time and the territorial mints would sooner or later replace a particular coin like a silver Shilling with an equivalent coin of a lower silver content thus making money of the constant degradation of the circulating coins; that was basically the constant loss of value everyone had to handle (those with productive capital would do this better than poor people who could only save their money).

Sums of money were usually given in a book currencies independent of the coins circulating: Units like the Reichsthaler and the Pound Sterling had stable fixed silver or gold values while the existing coins would make a varying sum at any given moment. Traders knew the fixed ratios between two currencies like "9 Pound Sterling is 40 Reichstaler" and these ratios remained stable from the 17th into the 18th century. "Bills of exchange" ("Wechsel") would make it unnecessary to carry larger sums of money from one spot to another. You contacted a Merchant with connections to a city you wanted to visit; you gave him the money you want to spend in that other city and he would give you a bill of exchange on which his business partner abroad would give you that very sum in local currency. The merchants in turn could use temporary deficits as assets in their own internal trading.

The system was globally complex with the constant degradation of circulating coinages and the flow of the metals gold and silver between the nations. As soon as a nation had a different fixing of the gold-silver balance the market would create a flow of the undervalued metal into those parts of the world that did not follow the metrics.

Calculate with historical moneys

Calculations with the established exchange rates like the "9 Pound Sterling equals 40 Reichsthaler" are relatively safe between 1650 and 1750. The The Marteau Early 18th-Century Currency Converter offers a tool set.

You can otherwise gain independence with a calculation that converts the sum into silver or gold equivalents. This is relatively safe up to the year 1871 when big players like Germany introduce the Gold standard without taking care of the silver value any longer. Up to that point individual nations could move from gold to silver standards and back with minor economic repercussions - they still remained in a corridor of the global notion of rough equivalents between gold and silver. After the 1860s, however, silver is loosing rapidly against gold, jumping from a ratio of once 1:14 to 1:100. These fluctuations are not yet over, we are still witnessing a good deal of speculation on the gold-silver parity especially with anticipations of the rise and fall of gold on the silver market.

Use SPARQL to convert sums into silver equivalents

FactGrid coins and FactGrid items for the stable book currencies (should all) come with silver and gold equivalents (not to be confused wit the silver content that has its own property) and with date ranges for this information, so that you can use a conversion into the silver equivalent to compare statements of values between currencies and over longer periods of time.

The following search gives the SPARQL-code for a conversion - here of German 19th-century Reichstaler: