The Secret History of Arlus and Odolphus (1710). (Q219014)

From FactGrid
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No description defined
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The Secret History of Arlus and Odolphus (1710).
No description defined

    Statements

    0 references
    1710
    0 references
    The Secret| HISTORY| OF| Arlus and Odolphus,| Ministers of State to the| Empress of Grandinsula.| In which are discover'd the Labour'd| Artifices formerly us'd for the Remo-|val of ARLUS, and the true Causes| of his late Restoration, upon the| Dismission of ODOLPHUS and| the QUINQUINVIRATE.| Humbly offer'd to those Good People of| GRANDINSULA, who have not yet| done wond'ring, why that PRINCESS| wou'd Change so Notable a Ministry.| [rule]| In nova fert animus mutatas dicere Formas| Corpora -----| [rule]| Printed in the Year MDCCX.
    0 references
    Geschichte vom Bruch im Kabinett der Empress [Queen Anne] über der Frage der Fortführung des Krieges. Arlus [Harley] teilt bei ihm eingehende, annehmbare Friedensangebote Odolphus [Godolphin] und Fortunatus [Marlborough] mit, die in Eigeninteresse an der Fortführung des Krieges sogleich ablehnen. Er wendet sich an die Königin doch auch Hautisara [Haughty Zarah, die Duchess of Marlborough] und Fortunatus tun dies; letztere mit dem Erfolg, daß Arlus als offensichtlich gegen die anderen Minister Intrigierender untragbar wird. Die Ironie des Erzählers besteht in expliziten Parteinahmen, Glanzstellen Seite 16-26: die Dialoge mit der Königin. (German)
    0 references
    Story of the break in the Empress's [Queen Anne's] cabinet over the question of continuing the war. Arlus [Harley] communicates the acceptable peace offers he receives to Odolphus [Godolphin] and Fortunatus [Marlborough], who immediately reject them out of their own interest in continuing the war. He addresses the queen but Hautisara [Haughty Zarah, the Duchess of Marlborough] and Fortunatus also do so; the latter with the result that Arlus becomes intolerable as someone who is obviously scheming against the other ministers. The narrator's irony consists in explicit partisanship, highlights pages 16-26: the dialogues with the queen. (English)
    0 references